The infusion of campaign funding this week helps continue the already-existing trend of the two Democrats’ fundraising advantage over their Republican opponents.

In fact, small-dollar contributions raised online for the two Democrats over the past 48 hours alone have exceeded the total cash contributions raised by either of their Republican challengers for the entire time since the March 5th Primary election.

After several prominent blogs and online news outlets featured a new campaign video for Democratic candidates Judy Jennings and Rebecca Bell-Metereau this week, contrasting them with the current radical Republican SBOE, contributions started pouring in. As of Thursday afternoon, over $21,000 in online contributions had been received in the last few days. The current total from ActBlue alone can be seen here.

“I’m not surprised that people are upset about what the current SBOE is doing to our neighborhood schools,” said Rebecca Bell-Metereau, the Democratic nominee for SBOE district 5. Bell-Metereau’s opponent, Ken Mercer, is one of the current Board members who is part of the ultra-conservative voting bloc which has become the laughingstock of the nation.

“People understand that the State Board of Education should be wholly focused on educating our schoolchildren, not on ideological warfare and efforts to politicize public schools,” said Judy Jennings, the Democrat running for SBOE district 10. “These contributors are sending a clear signal with their checkbooks that they want a return to sanity on this Board, not a continuation of ideology-driven behavior worthy of The Daily Show,” Jennings said.

Meanwhile, Jennings’ and Bell-Metereau’s Republican opponents have already ducked one televised debate, sponsored by the League of Women Voters, and appear to be skipping a second debate sponsored by LULAC. The Democrats haven’t turned down a single debate invitation, despite the Republicans’ coordinated attempts to avoid facing their opponents and voters in debates sponsored by non-partisan sponsors.

# # #

Here’s a sampling of the online outlets joining in the last 48 hours on the nation-wide anger at the current SBOE:

Who is responsible for this confusion?  I lay the blame squarely on the radicals who threw in inflammatory and unreasonable suggested revisions all along the way–from wanting to remove Cesar Chavez, Barbara Jordan, and Thurgood Marshall and substitute Sean Hannity and Phyllis Schlafly, to eleventh-hour attempts to call the slave trade the “triangular trade.”  Even though the board ultimately rejected some of these extreme suggestions, it’s no wonder the public rebelled.  Many people are left with the impression that the curriculum contains some outrages that have been removed or altered, but the fact remains that extremists bullied the board into passing a highly politicized document.

What remains is a damaged SBOE, with zero credibility and a butchered curriculum still riddled with inaccuracy and instances of plagiarism.  This situation has hurt the entire education system in Texas. For every hour we engage in political bickering, we’re not spending that time addressing the need to lower our soaring dropout rate, grapple with problems of high-stakes testing, and determine how to hire and keep good teachers.

One might wonder why the board would engage in such a destructive and divisive process, wasting countless hours micromanaging the curriculum and squandering limited resources for education.  The answer lies in the words of these extremists:  Cynthia Dunbar’s calls public education a “subtly deceptive instrument of perversion.” My opponent, incumbent Ken Mercer, brags about giving a teacher coalition a “well deserved spanking.”

These radicals simply don’t respect public education. Mr. Mercer, didn’t even send his two children to public school.  Many extremist backers have financial investments in charter schools, textbooks, and testing materials designed for private schools that purvey their own worldview.  These members certainly have a right to send their children to private schools, but they should not have a right to undermine the reputation of public education, schools, and teachers.  We can send them that message by voting them off the board in November.

At this point, it is useless to get mired in the specifics of the damaged curriculum, after the board’s “death by a thousand cuts.”  Let’s focus on the big picture and determine what needs to be done.  We must elect reasonable people in Districts 5 and 10 and then call for a complete review of the curriculum by teachers and experts in the field.  Final decisions on the curriculum should take place in 2011, when we’ll have a board in place that reflects the will of the people.  Many of the bullies who sit on the board managed to get there with money from a tiny minority of supporters with radical views.  The board should reflect the views of the larger population in Texas.  After the negative attention the board has received, more people are looking carefully at candidates, and this election in November will reflect the attitudes of a larger number of participating voters.

This group of ideologues is hopeless, and attempting to conduct a reasonable dialogue with them is doomed to failure.  Only the election in November will change things.  People ask what we will be able to do if we are elected.  With real leadership, we can return the board to a reasonable process with the clear goal of improving education in Texas.

The May meeting provided a good blueprint of what is wrong with the current board. At the outset of the public testimony, Chair Gail Lowe stated that with 205 signed up to speak, it would take ten hours for all the participants to deliver their three-minute statements.  Ha!  By mid-afternoon, they had only made their way through about seventeen speakers.  Instead of simply sticking to their stated rules and allowing all of those signed up a chance to say their piece, board members indulged themselves in the opportunity to speak and air their own views at every possible occasion.  Meanwhile, people who had driven 800 miles from El Paso and other far corners of the state fretted over whether they would have a chance to speak at all.

The board demonstrated the same lack of discipline in their own editing process.  At times people were mired in minutiae of language or “grammarical changes,” as Terri Leo put it.  On other occasions extremist board members soared with their intoxication over big ideas.  Terri Leo struggled to keep John Calvin in the Enlightenment, completely failing to understand what the Enlightenment was all about.

After hearing again and again that they should delay their final vote and send the mangled curriculum back to the review committees to clean up the mess board members had made, the board trudged through hundreds of tiny revisions, with no method and no plan.  Instead of grouping revisions into some reasonable categories, say, and voting on “grammarical” and non-substantive changes in large blocks, the extremists on the board worry over every item with mind-numbing thoroughness. They are not thorough, however, in checking what really counts, such as plagiarized passages in their own suggested revisions.

This board has exactly the same problems I recognize in my students:  poor critical thinking, research, language, and problem-solving skills.  They mix up big concepts with specific examples.  Their method for making the curriculum “fair” is simply to throw in a name from “their side” every place they recognize someone from the “other side,” thus muddying such concepts as the Enlightenment or reform and muckracker movements by  trying to add in totally unrelated figures who represented completely different schools of thought.

One story from the day seems to sum up both the current board’s attitude and its incompetence: it appears that this board left a plagiarized section in the current version, but they did change the UCLA website’s phrase (http://gseis.ucla.edu/courses/ed253a/american-exceptionalism.htm) from “democratic” republic to “constitutional” republic.

May the board learn what plagiarism is and stop doing it.

So what are we going to do?  Stop dithering, like the current SBOE, and put our time, donations, and energy into electing good people in November.

Please visit www.VoteRebecca.com and sign up for e-mail about the campaign. And please contributenow to my campaign so that we can ensure that the extremists are not able to write the final chapter.

(Cross Posted at Daily Kos)

When Michael Soto delivered his testimony on the plagiarized material, you could literally see the lawmakers’ jaws drop.  For academics, plagiarism and academic dishonesty merit a grade of F and possible expulsion from the university.  Apparently for Mr. McLeroy, it’s just business as usual.  Too bad he wasn’t there to explain himself.  In fact, not a single board member bothered to attend the legislative hearing.

This  hearing was important and informative, but Chairwoman Gail Lowe could not find time in her schedule to attend the hearings.  She said at first that she couldn’t afford the travel, but when the legislative caucus offered her travel money and lodging, she claimed that she couldn’t take time out of her busy schedule.  She is, by the way, self-employed.

The refusal of current board members to participate in discussions about the board’s actions with teachers and legislators is shocking but not surprising.  The negligence and bad faith of certain members of this board are breath-taking, but we need to keep ourselves focused on a very simple goal:  Elect Judy Jennings for District 10 and Rebecca Bell-Metereau (full disclosure–that’s me) in District 5.  It’s just that simple.  Mike Soto is running in a solidly Democratic district, and the races in 5 and 10 will be close.  While we have a disadvantage historically, these two races are absolutely winnable, especially given the behavior of the current board.  Every bit of bad publicity works to our benefit, but we need to follow up with the message that there is a simple solution to this problem.  Contribute, no matter where you live, and vote in the November election if you live in Texas.

Now, I leave you with this question:  What is the most effective way to convince everyone to contribute, even if it’s just a few dollars a month, to rescue Texas education.  You can contribute if you want to help education in Texas and around the nation. As we have seen, bad education in Texas is infectious, and it may be coming to your state soon.

(Cross posted at Daily Kos)

Within the Republican Party, people no longer strive for compromise in a range of opinions.  Rather, in a phenomenon called social norming, they vie for the position of most conservative.  Each candidate tries to prove that he or she is even more right wing than the other, and the result is a party that swings further and further toward crazy.  Fed by radio talk shows and Fox News, followers live in an odd echo chamber, in which pundits parrot identical phrases for each news story.  These party lines make wonderful fodder for the Daily Show and the Colbert Report, but what are they doing to our ability to function as a civil society?  What are they doing to promote an educated citizenry with a thriving economy?

While the larger political world churns away, another sector quietly widens this separation of Texas from the rest of the nation.  Eight people who dislike and mistrust public education dominate the State Board of Education, which rules elementary and high schools in Texas. They have turned the 4.7 million young people in K-12 into pawns in a series of culture wars over the last two decades.  The results have been devastating.  Fed an anemic curriculum that focuses increasingly on standardized tests, Texas now ranks 49^th in Head Start programs and 51^st in high school graduation rates.

Texas was once a leader in textbooks around the country.  Few people realize that today we no longer have that influential connection with the rest of the U.S.  Through the wonders of customized publishing, Texas now has its own special set of dumbed-down textbooks, filled with inaccuracies and lacking the information other students across the nation receive.  Our teachers suffer a relentless grind of preparing students for tests.  If they don’t succeed at this mind-numbing routine, they risk losing pay and even their schools.

We might wonder how primary and secondary education in Texas developed into such a peculiar institution.  Follow the money in order to understand why this handful of board members ignores the true mission of education. Some people make (and contribute) a great deal of money selling these instruments of academic torture.  Designed and administered by Texas-based companies, these exams are not nationally normed, so no one can judge how the young people of Texas compare to the rest of the country.  When students hit college entrance exams, we get some inkling that our students perform below other states, but these tests measure only the fraction of elite students who plan to go on to higher education.  Therefore the growing gulf between our students and the rest of the nation doesn’t look as wide as it really is.

Given this educational and political divide, we have to wonder if Texas hasn’t already seceded.  Let’s bring Texas back into the union by changing the face of Texas education.  We can make Texas a leader once again. Isn’t it time to rejoin the rest of the nation and give new board members a chance to restore respect for our State Board of Education?

Rebecca Bell-Metereau

Extremists on the Texas State Board of Education are apparently very sensitive, and they want to engineer the curriculum so that none of it hurts their feelings. 

They want to eliminate evolutionary theory from the science curriculum because it makes them unhappy to consider that primates (what we humans are) have a common ancestry with other primates that aren’t as pretty as we are.

Now it seems that they’re just as sensitive about social studies.  Historical figures like Cesar Chavez, Thurgood Marshall, and Barbara Jordan make them unhappy, so they want to eliminate them from the history books especially designed for Texas youth by a handful of SBOE members.  They would like instead to feature such entertainers as Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh as important historical figures, because these professional cheerleaders make them feel good about our national identity.  The state school board extremists also want to eliminate discussion of any events that make the United States or the free enterprise system look bad in any way whatsoever.  Most importantly, they don’t see any reason to include information about any of those other strange countries they’ve heard might exist out there in the world.

I imagine some people had the same kind of hurt feelings when Galileo tried to convince them that the earth rotated around the sun, a theory based on painstaking scientific measurements.   They hated the idea that we might not be living at the center of the universe,  and they felt that it was an insult to humanity to be described as existing on some round ball chained to the sun.

We’ve come a long way since those dark times.  Most people accept that the earth is round and that it rotates around the sun, but we still have a few holdouts that want education to make them feel good about themselves.  So here we are, centuries later in Texas trying to rewrite the definition of science and social studies, all because seven extremists on the State Board of Education have hurt feelings.